Model comparison · updated July 2026

gpt-oss vs Qwen3.5: the practical comparison

gpt-oss (OpenAI) and Qwen3.5 (Alibaba (Qwen team)) side by side — architecture, context, licensing, pricing, and a clear recommendation for when each one wins.

The verdict

Both target deployable open weights under Apache 2.0. Qwen3.5's family wins on breadth and per-size quality — its 9B variant with 256K context is the standout local model of the generation. gpt-oss counters with OpenAI provenance and the 120B's clever single-80GB-GPU fit. For most local and mid-scale deployments, Qwen3.5 is the stronger recommendation.

gpt-oss vs Qwen3.5 at a glance

gpt-ossQwen3.5
VendorOpenAI (United States)Alibaba (Qwen team) (China)
Open weightsYes — downloadableYes — downloadable
LicenseApache 2.0 — permissive, patent-granting, free for commercial useApache 2.0 — permissive, patent-granting, free for commercial use
Parameters117B (gpt-oss-120b) / 21B (gpt-oss-20b) (5.1B / 3.6B active)397B (17B active)
Context window128K tokens262K tokens (native)
Modalitiestexttext
PricingVaries by hosting provider (open weights)Varies by hosting provider (open weights)
Released2025-08-052026-02-16

Specs and pricing verified July 2026.

About gpt-oss

gpt-oss is OpenAI's return to open weights — its first since GPT-2. The August 2025 release shipped two MoE reasoning models under Apache 2.0: gpt-oss-120b (117B total, 5.1B active, single-80GB-GPU serving in native MXFP4) and gpt-oss-20b (21B total, runs on a 16GB consumer GPU), both with configurable reasoning effort and 128K context.

Strategically it validated the open-weight thesis from the least likely vendor, and practically the 20B became one of the most-run local models in the world — the default 'serious model on a laptop.' For pure capability the 2026 Chinese frontier models outclass it, but for accessible, US-origin, Apache-2.0 deployment it remains a staple.

Full specs, benchmarks, and hardware guidance: the gpt-oss page.

About Qwen3.5

Qwen3.5 is Alibaba's February 2026 generation and the efficiency benchmark of the open-weight field: the 397B-A17B flagship activates just 17B parameters per token yet beats Alibaba's own trillion-parameter Qwen3-Max — at 8.6× the throughput at 32K context and 19× at 256K. All open-weight variants ship under Apache 2.0, the most enterprise-friendly license in common use.

The release is a full family, not one model: from the 397B flagship down to a 9B variant with a native 256K context window that runs on consumer hardware. That spread — one architecture, Apache 2.0 everywhere, sizes from phone to datacenter — is why Qwen has become the default base-model family for fine-tuners and the most-adopted open-weight line by download count.

Full specs, benchmarks, and hardware guidance: the Qwen3.5 page.

Choosing between them

Choose gpt-oss for:

  • Local deployment on consumer hardware (20B on a 16GB GPU)
  • US-origin open weights under Apache 2.0 for policy-constrained buyers
  • Configurable reasoning-effort workloads

Choose Qwen3.5 for:

  • Enterprise deployments that require Apache 2.0 licensing
  • Efficiency-critical serving (17B active parameters, extreme throughput)
  • Fine-tuning projects — the broadest size ladder in open weights

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss better than Qwen3.5?

Both target deployable open weights under Apache 2.0. Qwen3.5's family wins on breadth and per-size quality — its 9B variant with 256K context is the standout local model of the generation. gpt-oss counters with OpenAI provenance and the 120B's clever single-80GB-GPU fit. For most local and mid-scale deployments, Qwen3.5 is the stronger recommendation.

Which is cheaper: gpt-oss or Qwen3.5?

gpt-oss: Varies by hosting provider (open weights). Qwen3.5: Varies by hosting provider (open weights). Both are open-weight, so self-hosting costs depend on your hardware and utilization.

Can I self-host gpt-oss and Qwen3.5?

gpt-oss: yes — weights are published under Apache 2.0. Qwen3.5: yes — weights are published under Apache 2.0.