Model comparison · updated July 2026

Qwen vs DeepSeek: the practical comparison

Qwen3.5 (Alibaba (Qwen team)) and DeepSeek V4 (DeepSeek) side by side — architecture, context, licensing, pricing, and a clear recommendation for when each one wins.

The verdict

DeepSeek V4 is the capability flagship; Qwen3.5 is the efficiency and ecosystem play. V4 wins on peak reasoning and its 1M context. Qwen counters with Apache 2.0 (the cleaner enterprise license), 17B-active serving economics, and a family that scales from 9B to 397B — which matters enormously if you fine-tune or deploy across device classes. Most organizations end up using both: DeepSeek at the frontier, Qwen everywhere else.

Qwen vs DeepSeek at a glance

Qwen3.5DeepSeek V4
VendorAlibaba (Qwen team) (China)DeepSeek (China)
Open weightsYes — downloadableYes — downloadable
LicenseApache 2.0 — permissive, patent-granting, free for commercial useMIT — weights free to download, self-host, fine-tune, and use commercially
Parameters397B (17B active)1.6T (49B active)
Context window262K tokens (native)1M tokens
Modalitiestexttext
PricingVaries by hosting provider (open weights)$1.74 in / $3.48 out per 1M tokens
Released2026-02-162026-04-24

Specs and pricing verified July 2026.

About Qwen3.5

Qwen3.5 is Alibaba's February 2026 generation and the efficiency benchmark of the open-weight field: the 397B-A17B flagship activates just 17B parameters per token yet beats Alibaba's own trillion-parameter Qwen3-Max — at 8.6× the throughput at 32K context and 19× at 256K. All open-weight variants ship under Apache 2.0, the most enterprise-friendly license in common use.

The release is a full family, not one model: from the 397B flagship down to a 9B variant with a native 256K context window that runs on consumer hardware. That spread — one architecture, Apache 2.0 everywhere, sizes from phone to datacenter — is why Qwen has become the default base-model family for fine-tuners and the most-adopted open-weight line by download count.

Full specs, benchmarks, and hardware guidance: the Qwen3.5 page.

About DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the flagship of DeepSeek's V4 family, released on April 24, 2026, and the strongest argument yet that open-weight models compete at the frontier. It is a 1.6-trillion-parameter mixture-of-experts model that activates just 49B parameters per token, pairs a 1M-token context window with up to 384K tokens of output, and ships under a plain MIT license — no usage thresholds, no acceptable-use gate.

The headline engineering story is the attention stack. V4 combines Compressed Sparse Attention (CSA), which compresses KV entries 4× along the sequence with softmax-gated pooling, with Heavily Compressed Attention (HCA) at 128× compression. The practical result: at 1M-token context, V4 Pro needs roughly 27% of the single-token inference FLOPs and 10% of the KV cache of DeepSeek-V3.2. Long context stopped being a luxury and became the default across DeepSeek's services.

Full specs, benchmarks, and hardware guidance: the DeepSeek V4 page.

Choosing between them

Choose Qwen3.5 for:

  • Enterprise deployments that require Apache 2.0 licensing
  • Efficiency-critical serving (17B active parameters, extreme throughput)
  • Fine-tuning projects — the broadest size ladder in open weights

Choose DeepSeek V4 for:

  • Frontier-level reasoning and coding on an open license
  • Very long documents and repositories (1M-token context as the default)
  • Teams that need Anthropic/OpenAI API compatibility with open-weight economics

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 better than DeepSeek V4?

DeepSeek V4 is the capability flagship; Qwen3.5 is the efficiency and ecosystem play. V4 wins on peak reasoning and its 1M context. Qwen counters with Apache 2.0 (the cleaner enterprise license), 17B-active serving economics, and a family that scales from 9B to 397B — which matters enormously if you fine-tune or deploy across device classes. Most organizations end up using both: DeepSeek at the frontier, Qwen everywhere else.

Which is cheaper: Qwen3.5 or DeepSeek V4?

Qwen3.5: Varies by hosting provider (open weights). DeepSeek V4: $1.74 in / $3.48 out per 1M tokens. Both are open-weight, so self-hosting costs depend on your hardware and utilization.

Can I self-host Qwen3.5 and DeepSeek V4?

Qwen3.5: yes — weights are published under Apache 2.0. DeepSeek V4: yes — weights are published under MIT.